Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Interviews: me, Langewiesche
Meanwhile, I wanted to post a link to my NewsQuake interview with William Langewiesche. Unfortunately the author of The Atomic Bazaar wasn't able to furnish a photo of himself playing a cherry-red Epiphone electric, but he did talk extensively and provocatively about nuclear proliferation, A.Q. Khan, and the need for a foreign policy based on dried-eyed pragmatism. Here's a sample exchange:
Langewiesche: Look, most governments today tend to look at the world in purely governmental terms. Fifty years ago, when much of the world was purely governmental, that made sense. But now you see a world in which the nation-state means less and less, and is increasingly a formality. We have a very difficult time acknowledging that.
Netscape: Certainly your last two books have described a borderless and (in some sense) lawless world.
Langwiesche: Oh, we don't have a difficult time acknowledging the lawlessness of the world--we're much concerned by it. What we're really conducting, in fact, is a global War On Disorder. But here's the confusing part: many of these disorderly places are not actually disorderly. They're just non-governmental. With the exception of a few weeks here and there, during periods of acute revolution and turmoil, there is some sort of organic power structure in place. It can be nominally criminal, or ideological, but it's always there. There's always something. And we do have the ability to tap into these power structures and work with them, even if we don't like them.
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
"The horses are real," he writes, "the stuntmen are real, the actors are real; they are all, at this moment, involved in a terrible fight in which the men want to subjugate the horses to their purpose and the horses want to get away; every now and again the blonde woman screams and shouts; it all really happened; and here it is, to be relived for the ten thousandth time before our eyes. Who would dare to say it is just a story?"If you can wrap your brain around that last paragraph, you get a prize! Meanwhile, Coetzee's rage at the callous enlistment of those mustangs reminded me of a passage in Saul Steinberg's Reflections and Shadows. It's much lighter in tone, with a hint of whimsical envy. But the animal in question, confined along with the author to a Fascist-era internment camp in Totoreto, Italy, has also been shanghaied into a rather squalid human enterprise:
With this indignant paragraph, we come full circle, back to Elizabeth Costello. That novel-as-lecture-series included a couple of long and eloquent harangues on animal rights from the protagonist. Again, the author seemed to be smuggling the essay into a narrative format. As it happens, though, those harangues had made an earlier appearance in The Lives of Animals (1999)--an actual lecture series, into which Coetzee had smuggled the feisty and fictional Costello. Clearly these hybrids are close to the author's heart. Yet the straightforward essays assembled in Inner Workings are, with a few exceptions, only fair-to-middling creations. Perhaps Elizabeth Costello should have been enlisted to write them all.
The pope gave us six lire a day as an allowance, and for his own peace of mind. Luckily I was there in May; it was warm, there was the fine spring sunshine, and already they were starting to find greens, lots of onions. I even saw a dog eating onions, a dog who lived with us and didn't know he was in a concentration camp.Finally, a couple of passage from Mark Jerome Walters's Courtship in the Animal Kingdom. I'll be frank and admit that when I pulled this book off the shelf, I assumed it was a work of fiction with a modishly ironic title--you can practically write the thing yourself. Instead it's exactly what it says. The great challenge, as the author concedes, is to avoid relentless anthropomorphism. Animals must not be viewed as fuzzy little avatars of human behavior or Aesopian exemplars. They are what they are. But a passage like this one still cuts a little too close to the bone:
Like many animals, the chaffinch finds itself in a bind when it comes to mating. It lives life in a delicate balance between fleeing from and attacking those who come too close. In a world of potentially dangerous strangers, the impulses of fight and flight must be kept in check. Mating intensifies this dilemma. To many animals, physical contact defies the basic instinct that has helped them to survive. Even some of the most gregarious have a threshold over which strangers may not pass.Pathetic little creatures, aren't they? Luckily I've gotten a better grip on my basic instincts. On the other hand, this next passage made me strangely uneasy:
If one were to pinpoint the most obvious difference within many species, it would probably be between male and female. Males and females of some species are so different that they have been mistakenly classified as different animals. Only by discovering some male and female ants and wasps in the act of mating can scientists tell that they belong to the same species. Among four families of deep-sea angler fish, which live two thousand feet down in pitch-black ocean depths, the females may be several thousand times larger than the males. Indeed, scientists were surprised to learn that the tiny parasitic appendages often found attached to the females were actually their mates.Sigh. I'll stop now.